top-401k-providers-2016.jpg

401K Providers: 2016 Top 20 Lists

Plan sponsors, that is companies that offer their employees a 401(k) plan, have many choices when selecting service providers for their defined contribution plans. The challenge for many businesses, especially for small businesses, is that the day-to-day running of their businesses leaves little time to review, monitor, and optimize their retirement plan. The result is that many plan sponsors lack a comprehensive understanding of who the top 401k providers are. PLANSPONSOR magazine conducts an annual recordkeeping survey profiling top providers. Here's their list of the 2016 top 401(k) providers and a few of my thoughts.



2016 TOP PROVIDERS (RECORDKEEPERS)

 

By Total Defined Contribution Assets ($MM)
     
1 Fidelity Investments $1,445,635
2 TIAA $437,247
3 Empower Retirement $410,909
4 Vanguard $392,861
5 Aon Hewitt $377,150
6 Voya Financial $288,658
7 Prudential Retirement $244,804
8 Wells Fargo $217,400
9 Transamerica Retirement Solutions $204,936
10 Xerox HR Solutions, LLC $185,092
11 Principal $174,420
12 Bank of America Merrill Lynch $158,155
13 T. Rowe Price $148,559
14 John Hancock Retirement Plan Services $124,325
15 Charles Schwab $120,266
16 MassMutual Financial Group $120,104
17 Nationwide $96,277
18 VALIC $82,656
19 Newport Group $75,509
20 ADP Retirement Services $59,720

 source: 2016 PLANSPONSOR Recordkeeping Survey

 

By Total Defined Contribution Plans
1 Paychex, Inc. 72,000
2 John Hancock Retirement Plan Services 55,404
3 ADP Retirement Services 55,015
4 Principal 51,262
5 Voya Financial 46,766
6 American Funds 45,639
7 Ascensus 44,840
8 Nationwide 38,075
9 Empower Retirement 35,426
10 Fidelity Investments 32,621
11 VALIC 32,348
12 MassMutual Financial Group 31,920
13 Security Benefit 30,999
14 AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company 28,622
15 Lincoln Financial Group 27,811
16 Transamerica Retirement Solutions 25,385
17 TIAA 24,412
18 Alliance Benefit Group 12,708
19 OneAmerica 11,881
20 Aspire Financial Services 10,325

source: 2016 PLANSPONSOR Recordkeeping Survey

Fewer But Stronger Providers

While defined contribution (DC) plans continue to grow in assets, number of plans, and participants, the number of recordkeeping service providers is declining. For example, Empower Retirement was established as a rebrand of Great-West Retirement Services, Putnam Investment's retirement business, and J.P Morgan Retirement Plan Services. John Hancock Retirement Plan Services acquired New York Life Retirement Plan Services. The Bank of Montreal sold its US retirement-services business to OneAmerica Financial Partners.

The result of this industry consolidation is that recordkeeping assets are concentrated among the largest 20 providers. The big are getting bigger -- through both acquisitions and organic growth. As recordkeeping services become commoditized, the remaining service providers are fewer in number but more dominant in position. They are better able to provide value and better technology to plans and their participants. Overall, these trends are benefiting plan participants.

Better Investment Choices

One of the areas where we see competition driving service providers to improve offerings is in the area of investments. Providers are increasingly offering open architecture investment platforms that allow 401(k) plans to offer the best funds across asset classes and strategies. According to PLANSPONSOR, 87% of recordkeepers now offer sponsors a choice of over 1,000 mutual funds, while 65% market over 4,000 mutual fund options. If your plan has very limited fund choices and a proprietary lineup dominated by a single fund company, take note! That could pose a risk to plan trustees.

No One-Size-Fits-All

Recordkeeping 401(k) providers can vary significantly in that some deliver more services while others promise less cost. Case in point, Paychex is the top 401k provider in the country based on number of DC plans. However, Paychex does not make the top 20 list based on assets ($.) How can this be? The reason is that Paychex shines as a provider for start up and smaller plans, i.e. plans with smaller assets and/or fewer participants. Like everything in life, there is no one-size-fits-all solution that is best for everyone. Therefore, plan sponsors need to maintain a process for evaluating their needs and trying to engage the best service providers to meet those needs. 

Your Needs Are a Moving Target

Don't allow your 401(k) plan to become stagnant. Even if your plan is set up perfectly today, your needs will change over time. Plan assets grow and the number of participants change. Therefore, it is a best practice to review your plan regularly to see if plan design changes can be implemented to benefit participants and make sure that your costs are reasonable. Further, you need to keep up on regulatory changes and keep your plan compliant. If your company's needs have changed dramatically, it could call for a complete change in 401(k) providers.

We Can Help

The process of reviewing your plan does not have to be difficult or time consuming. Whether you are trying to improve an existing plan or setup a new one, considering watching our 30-minute webinar where we discuss common 401(k) mistakes to avoid and ways to optimize your retirement plan. We want to help you ensure that you are working with the best 401(k) service providers for your company and its employees.

 

Researching 401(k) Service Providers? Don't miss reading this article...

3 Tips for Choosing the Best 401(k) Providers

401(k) checklist

When was the last time you reviewed your plan and evaluated your service providers? Please share your experiences and thoughts.

 
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Andrew Wang

Andrew Wang

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION 

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Runnymede Capital Management, Inc.-"Runnymede"), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Runnymede.  Please remember that if you are a Runnymede client, it remains your responsibility to advise Runnymede, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Runnymede is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Runnymede's current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. Please Note: Runnymede does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to Runnymede's web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.