Black Swan Watch: The Oil Bubble Bursts

black_swanMajor bear markets are typically caused by sharply rising interest rates, declines in corporate profits, gross overvaluation and severe recessions. The Runnymede team is always diligently and systematically monitoring the standings of these critical variables.

The most challenging factors which we spend time thinking about and analyzing are "Black Swan" events. These rare and unpredictable events cause severe damage because of psychological biases that make people individually and collectively blind. One potential black swan in our sights is the US shale oil bubble bursting. This has appeared on our radar screens because of the crude oil crash over the last half year which has seen prices of crude oil fall from $107/barrel to just $46/barrel today. Needless to say, this is a large deviation which has laid witness to a 57% decline in the price of oil. So what are the possible implications for the US economy and the stock market?

Jobs at risk

JobsShalevsNonShaleStates

The first risk is that a huge number of jobs may fall by the wayside. The US shale boom made the US the largest producer of oil in the world in 2014. However with prices now below breakeven in many projects, rigs are already being shut down and jobs losses are mounting quickly. As you can see in the chart above, the 5 shale states added 1.36 million jobs since December 2007 vs the non-shale states which lost 424,000 jobs. The ripple effect of lost jobs in this booming sector could be a severe drag going forward, not just for the energy sector, but for housing, restaurants, and services in these shale states.

Oil services company Baker Hughes just announced plans to slash 7,000 jobs and reduce capital spending by 20%. Rival Schlumberger announced plans to lay off 9,000 workers and this is just the tip of the iceberg. Baker Hughes CEO Martin Craighead said,

Our industry is clearly in the early stages of a down cycle, the same sort of cycle we enter once or twice a decade.

Subprime in 2007, Junk Bonds in 2015

Subprime triggered the domino effect in 2007 and it could be shale junk bonds that trigger the domino effect in 2015. How do these two mimic each other? The subprime crash was caused because investors didn't properly account for risk of the underlying assets of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). Furthermore, their prime rating was based on the assumption that real estate prices would go up steadily in perpetuity. The shale boom has similar characteristics as it is funded by investors hunger for yield in a low rate environment and it is reliant on oil prices staying high forever. Well surprise surprise. Real estate prices can go down and crude prices have crashed. Now the shockwaves will make their way through the financial markets.

According to Thomson Reuters in 2014, lending to oil and gas companies totaled over $465 billion, the highest annual total ever. Within the broad junk market, energy accounts for some 16%, a fourfold increase over the past decade. In the first week of January, the first casualty was a private company, WBH Energy, which filed for bankruptcy protection saying a lender refused to advance more money. One industry analyst warned, "There are too many ugly balance sheets... the group is not positioned for this downturn."

Stock Market Implications

The S&P 500 has an 8.3% weighting in the energy sector which is now in bearish territory having plummeted by over 25% since July. The good news is that the remaining eight S&P sectors remain in bullish formation. The crude oil crash could pull the US into recession and we will be keeping a keen watch on our economic indicators for any signs of weakening or job losses out of the shale states. This is very critical situation to watch in 2015.

New Call-to-action

 

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Chris Wang

Chris Wang

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Runnymede Capital Management, Inc.), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Runnymede Capital Management, Inc. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Runnymede Capital Management, Inc. is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of Runnymede Capital Management, Inc.’s current written disclosure statement discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.