Cost of Not Investing Your Captive Assets

In seven years of offering investment management services to captive insurance companies, we are acutely aware how conservative many captive owners are when it comes to investment objectives and goals.  A cookie cutter "one size fits all" approach does not work when it comes to constructing investment portfolios.  The makeup of a captive insurance company’s portfolio should take into account the type of risk insured, projected loss patterns, and cash needs.  In some cases, captive owners are so risk averse that they choose not to invest and are content to sleep well at night by owning money market funds and cash.  Among captive managers, accountants, and actuaries, quite a few people have asked me, "What is the cost of NOT investing?"

Even in today’s low interest rate environment, the opportunity cost of not investing can be significant. The key is the concept of compound interest.  This what Wikipedia says about the subject:
Compound interest arises when interest is added to the principal of a deposit or loan, so that, from that moment on, the interest that has been added also earns interest. This addition of interest to the principal is called compounding. A bank account, for example, may have its interest compounded every year: in this case, an account with $1000 initial principal and 20% interest per year would have a balance of $1200 at the end of the first year, $1440 at the end of the second year, and so on.

 Let's look at an example.

Suppose a captive has investable assets of $5,000,000. According to the Informa Research Deposit Report as of 8/21/13, the average money market fund had an Annual Percentage Yield of 0.11%. Compounding at this rate for 10 years results in $5,055,273.

Alternatively, let's assume that the captive invested in US Treasuries, and a very small portion to stocks, which very conservatively returned an average 3.0% annually.  After 10 years, the portfolio would be valued at $6,719,582.  The power of compounding is powerful, and the cost of not investing in the case is $1.66 million!

investment strategies for captive insurance

This is a very simplistic illustration, of course, since we are assuming that the annual rate of return remains low and does not change over 10 years.  I will save discussion of specific investment strategies for captive insurance companies for another article.  Notably, no contributions to capital and surplus were included here so the actual capital appreciation may be understated. The conclusion is that the cost of not investing one's captive assets can be meaningful; and like with retirement planning, the earlier one starts - the better.

Download our  Captive Insurance E-Brochure

In seven years of offering investment management services to captive insurance companies, we are acutely aware how conservative many captive owners are when it comes to investment objectives and goals.  A cookie cutter "one size fits all" approach does not work when it comes to constructing investment portfolios.  The makeup of a captive insurance company’s portfolio should take into account the type of risk insured, projected loss patterns, and cash needs.  In some cases, captive owners are so risk averse that they choose not to invest and are content to sleep well at night by owning money market funds and cash.  Among captive managers, accountants, and actuaries, quite a few people have asked me, "What is the cost of NOT investing?"

Even in today’s low interest rate environment, the opportunity cost of not investing can be significant. The key is the concept of compound interest.  This what Wikipedia says about the subject:

Compound interest arises when interest is added to the principal of a deposit or loan, so that, from that moment on, the interest that has been added also earns interest. This addition of interest to the principal is called compounding. A bank account, for example, may have its interest compounded every year: in this case, an account with $1000 initial principal and 20% interest per year would have a balance of $1200 at the end of the first year, $1440 at the end of the second year, and so on.

 

Let's look at an example.

Suppose a captive has investable assets of $5,000,000. According to the Informa Research Deposit Report as of 8/21/13, the average money market fund had an Annual Percentage Yield of 0.11%. Compounding at this rate for 10 years results in $5,055,273.

Alternatively, let's assume that the captive invested in US Treasuries, and a very small portion to stocks, which very conservatively returned an average 3.0% annually.  After 10 years, the portfolio would be valued at $6,719,582.  The power of compounding is powerful, and the cost of not investing in the case is $1.66 million!

investment strategies for captive insurance

This is a very simplistic illustration, of course, since we are assuming that the annual rate of return remains low and does not change over 10 years.  I will save discussion of specific investment strategies for captive insurance companies for another article.  Notably, no contributions to capital and surplus were included here so the actual capital appreciation may be understated. The conclusion is that the cost of not investing one's captive assets can be meaningful; and like with retirement planning, the earlier one starts - the better.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Andrew Wang

Andrew Wang

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION 

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Runnymede Capital Management, Inc.-"Runnymede"), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Runnymede.  Please remember that if you are a Runnymede client, it remains your responsibility to advise Runnymede, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Runnymede is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Runnymede's current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. Please Note: Runnymede does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to Runnymede's web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.