Do Higher Yields Mean Higher Risks For Captive Insurance Investment Portfolios?

Captive Investing Today

Since the financial crisis began in 2007, the Federal Reserve has taken extraordinary actions including reducing the level of short-term interest rates to near zero and pushing long rates to historic lows. This has impacted captive insurance portfolios that strive to safely generate enough investment income to cover operating costs, maintain statutory reserves, and pay claims when needed. With new Fed chief Janet Yellen taking charge soon, most participants believe the key themes for 2014 will be timing of the Fed taper and how financial markets will react.

In these uncertain times, let's look for a lesson from Pimco's flagship Total Return fund, the world's largest bond fund, managing $244 billion as of the end of November. Last month marked the seventh straight month of outflows for the fund, an estimated $36.9 billion year-to-date and the biggest on record in a calendar year since 1987. Also, the fund is down 1.24% in total returns this year. While many media outlets have covered these topics recently, there is more to this story.

In Search of Yield

Daryl Jones, director of research at Hedgeye Risk Management, recently wrote in Fortune, "The broader issue with bond managers like Pimco is how far afield they have journeyed in search of yield. And therein lies the key question: At what cost does this hunt for yield come?"

Hedgeye estimates that almost 34% of Pimco Total Returns holdings are in agency Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS). Look at the chart below comparing the spread of agency MBS to the 10-year Treasury Yield.


Prior to the financial crisis, this spread was around 126 basis points. It has now narrowed to approximately 68 basis points. In other words, the almighty chase for yield has effectively priced mortgage backed securities to one of the lowest levels of risk that we've seen in the asset class. Even if the spread for Agency MBS normalized by just 50 basis points, to pre-crisis levels, it would have a meaningful impact on the market. By our estimation, allowing for modified duration, a 50 basis increase (reversal of tapering for instance) in yield would lead to 5% downside in the Agency MBS market. The issue for firms like PIMCO is that a 5% correction in one of its more significant asset class exposures is likely to lead to continued underperformance and accelerated outflows. Outflows and decreased liquidity, of course, are only likely to exacerbate any move in price in the MBS market.

Remember, there is no free lunch. History is full of examples of how "chasing yield" can be a very costly investment mistake. Fixed income is supposed to be your safe money so safety should come first.

Let us not forget how we got to this zero interest rate environment in the first place. I bet all those investors who loaded up on "safe" sub-prime mortgage-backed securities for the extra yield wish they had done things differently.

Download our  Captive Insurance E-Brochure

photo credit: "Risk Key" by Got Credit is licensed under CC BY 2.0

What has your captive insurance company been doing to increase investment income?  Are you chasing yield?  Is it worth the risk?

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: Andrew Wang

Andrew Wang


Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Runnymede Capital Management, Inc.-"Runnymede"), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Runnymede.  Please remember that if you are a Runnymede client, it remains your responsibility to advise Runnymede, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Runnymede is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Runnymede's current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. Please Note: Runnymede does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to Runnymede's web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.

Search Website

Annuity Review Database

Follow Our Podcast

Google Podcasts
Apple Podcasts

Recent Posts